« Don't Blame the Patient | Main | The Love of Another Specialty »
Are HIPAA Privacy Rules Too Restrictive?
Anthony Rudine -- The other day, just before I left to go home, I was walking through the hospital to finish some things – the usual daily tasks – and out of the corner of my eye, I spotted an old friend. I was not completely sure, but after walking back across the doorway once again, I was indeed correct. I walked in to say hello, and it turned out that this old friend of mine was there visiting with another friend's mother, who had recently been admitted to the hospital.
After some brief "hellos" and "how have you beens" this old friend inquired if I knew anything about the patient’s condition. My reply? No, I don’t, I’m sorry.
Here is where the story gets a little tricky, so be sure to pay attention. My other friend, the patient’s daughter, by way of the patient, asked if I could look and see if there was anything serious going on that they should be concerned about. Not a good question to get, ever.
I knew this would be a HIPAA violation, so I went to speak with the physician, and certainly not look anything up.
I stalled for a minute outside the room and then went back in to say that I was not allowed to look anything up in the computer system about the patient’s condition, etc.
I'm not saying that I did not want to look it up. I'm not saying that it made sense for me not to look it up, because it didn’t. I'm just saying that I didn’t do it, because we all know that would be illegal. And I don’t want to break any laws here.
The problem I have with this is the following: this patient, and her loved ones, knew nothing of her condition. They did not know the severity of the condition. They did not have the slightest idea of the prognosis. And they were simply asking for some information. No doubt they asked their physician earlier in the day, and were not given satisfactory information. No doubt the same questions were posed, but went unanswered. And here I was, in a position to help, but restricted by the guidelines of a poorly written law.
Does this make any sense to you? It certainly doesn’t to me. A patient is asking for their own health information, which I had access to, and I could not give it to her. I could not tell her if she needed to phone other family members to come to the hospital, or if this was something she should be worried about. I could give her nothing but an apology.
What a load of bull. Was I supposed to get this patient to sign a release and authorize me to tell her how sick she was? It seems grossly unfair to patients that healthcare providers are restricted from doing their primary job – helping those in need, in case you forgot – because an obscure and overwhelming law precludes my actions. Make all of the good apples pay for the few bad ones. That seems to be the logic here.
What supporters of HIPAA fail to realize is that it is not the physicians who lose here – it is the patients.
Am I wrong?
July 30, 2006 | Permalink
Comments
It makes sense to me that you could not give information about the patient's condition to your friend (the patient's daughter). However, I do not understand why more information could not be given to the patient, either via you or the patient's physician that you consulted with when your friend asked for the info... Perhaps I missed a step, but why couldn't more information be given to the patient?
Posted by: CZ | Jul 31, 2006 1:15:38 PM
I think that physicians lose too, not as badly as patients, but they lose because patients begin to not trust their doctors, they begin to think that being a physician is all about the money and not about the patient, witch for most of us is not true. I think this law needs a lot of work
Posted by: ETM | Aug 1, 2006 3:31:11 PM
HIPAA was suppose to protect patient privacy from discloser to the public, employers, and to a certain extent to protect the patient from being locked out of the insurnace system. Instead we have a law that basically protects the insurance industry from the patients, locking patients out of their own medical information while creating a large paperwork burden on healtcare professionals and their support staffs.
Posted by: DWH | Aug 1, 2006 4:02:41 PM
HIPAA is a disaster. I dont know if it was intended to be what it is today, but somehow it has been taken to an insane level whether we interpreted it all wrong or what. But, all you hear is that you cant do that and you have to be careful with this and that all due to HIPAA. The above post was right. I think it was intended to be to prevent insurance companies from getting unnecessary and sensitive info about the pts. I think this whole HIPAA thing should be readdressed and clarified for god's sake.
Posted by: James | Aug 1, 2006 6:55:08 PM
Hippa was put into being, in my opinion, to protect anyone other than the patient from learning about a patient's condition. It has something to do with insurance companies, but frankly, most patients sign that right right back to the insurance company when they are admitted to a hospital. So, that leaves the other reason for HIPPA. A lot of people, some family some nosy friends, have a habit during lengthly hospital stays, of discussing with a nursing staff the condition of the patient in the room. I myself have walked in to a hospital room while my father was critically ill to find my mother's nosy "concerned" friend arguing with nurses about what should be done with my father's care and the nurses actually answering their questions. This is what HIPPA should be protecting against. When physicians enter a room to discuss a patient on a daily basis, all parties in the room should be identified by the physician before the conversation regarding the patient begins. I bet a lot of times there are people sitting with the family that the spouse or patient would rather not hear every detail of their condition spoken about. I also don't think it appropriate for all physicians to have privy to all charts when it is not their patient. What if the patient is a physician and he or she doesn't want every doc in the hospital knowing what's wrong with them??? Probably the physician you talked to may not have wanted any information out to the daughter or especially the daughter's friend, until the physician had time to discuss it solely with the patient first.
Posted by: vonna | Aug 5, 2006 12:19:40 PM