« The Choices Patients Make | Main | The Beauty of Checklists »
An Awakening
Ben Ferguson -- Sometimes in medical school, especially during first year, you really feel like you’re back in undergrad again, learning about seemingly mundane details that don’t appear to be applicable to the practice of medicine. I got this feeling a lot during my first year and even at points well into my second year.
The first time I really, truly felt like I was a medical student was when I interviewed Mrs. D, a teacher from Chicago. We had just finished the heme/onc section of CPP that day and I felt like I was still really solid on most of the material. Anemias, leukemias, lymphomas, signs and symptoms -- all fresh in my head. (CPP stands for Clinical Pathophysiology and Therapeutics and is the best class at my school by far, the one that makes you realize there actually was a valid reason that you learned all that biochemistry and physiology and neurology and anatomy during first year that, at the time, seemed entirely detached from the practice of medicine.)
After a brief meeting with our resident who took us around to a few patients to expose us to some clinical findings like jugular venous distention indicating congestive heart failure, displaced point of maximal impulse indicating left ventricular hypertrophy, and spider hemorrhages from cirrhosis, I was introduced to Mrs. D and began to run through my lengthy list of questions just like with every other patient: absolutely robotically and without a clue as to the reasoning behind my questions.
After finishing up her history of present illness, I started to realize that I knew what was wrong with her. She had some of the same signs and symptoms that actual, real-life doctors had just told me should be present in situations like these. Fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, cachexia, lightheadedness, dark urine, hepatomegaly, severe jaundice, scleral icterus -- it was like she had memorized a textbook for the purpose of reciting it back to me. She couldn’t have been more spot-on had she been a standardized patient trained to present with these findings. And I felt so empowered. I felt resonation with the questions I had been asking all these patients over the past year instead of just reading them off a list. I at once knew their value like I hadn’t realized before, and I was able to direct my questioning according to her specific complaints. And it was great.
At the same time, it wasn’t great. I realized she had acute myelogenous leukemia, a nasty adult leukemia that is relatively aggressive and has a relatively poor prognosis. And I realized that I learned about this disease in a classroom, free from emotion and patients and crying and fear of one’s outcome, secure in my own worry-free environment.
Meeting Mrs. D there and coming to the abrupt realization that she was in dire straits was a very difficult situation to be thrust into. On the one hand, she introduced me to the true value in knowledge about diseases and their management; on the other, she showed me that we should always remember what we are learning. We are not merely learning scientific facts. We are learning about human diseases that affect patients’ lives -- not just their bodies -- in ways that we can’t always comprehend as hard as we may try. We should never forget that.
December 7, 2007 in Ben Ferguson | Permalink
Comments
Very true Ben.
It was the same for me when I figured out that the child I was examining had ALL.
You actually do feel differently initially at 'looking' what you've read but when your done with that feel you don't like 'seeing' book material in reality.
Posted by: Habiba | Dec 7, 2007 8:38:55 AM
That's why I think med students need more real life experience in medicine, perhaps prehospital, before they go to med school. Experiencing other people's emotions at the news you give them is something that isn't taught effectively in medical school. However, teaching the God complex is taught all too well--and that bothers me.
Good luck!
-j
Posted by: Jared | Dec 7, 2007 10:14:38 AM
Great article, Ben. And so very true. I had a similar experience once when my partner told me about his uncle who was having problems. As he rattled off the various symptoms, I realized right away that he was describing a textbook case of myasthenia gravis. I was so excited that I knew the diagnosis that I jumped in the air and screamed "it's myasthenia gravis!" with much excitement. I was so happy that I knew the diagnosis because it meant that I actually did learn something in med school. He immediately gave me a look of disgust because I was so thrilled about my knowledge that I was showing no sympathy for what his uncle was going through. I apologized and felt bad that I had been so excited that I hadn't stopped to care about what was really going on. I'm not an uncaring person, but I was hearing the symptoms, and not the story of a person. We have all this knowledge drilled into us for so long, and yet it's never in the context of human suffering, but rather a constellation of symptoms to memorize and regurgitate on exams. I agree with you that we always need to remember the human component of what we learn.
Posted by: Kendra | Dec 10, 2007 4:59:47 AM
Thanks Ben for this enlightening story. I just did my paediatrics posting and wrote on ALL presented with Tumour Lysis Syndrome. A 2 years old girl arrived in a collapsed state and all investigations were done. Eventually, BMA & trephine biopsy reviewed ALL with intermediate prognosis.I followed her closely till the end of my posting. Currently, 6months after i left that wonderful posting, I was overwhelmed to see her clad in 'Barbie' style clothes embracing and kissing a teddy bear, greeting everyone on her way back home after chemotherapy. Although she is just barely 2 years old, she is my teacher and friend! (P/s: of course we need the parents as interviewee : )It's true that our patients are our living textbooks as Sir William Osler puts it : Medicine is learned by the bedside and not in the classroom. Keep the learning spirit high!
Posted by: william | Dec 13, 2007 7:11:27 AM
So, I am a pre-med student slogging through ochem, and I absolutely think it is irrelevant in terms of content sometimes. However, the content is not always the point - it is the act of memorizing and the thinking that goes with being able to memorize certain topics, concepts, etc. that makes you prepared to become an authentic doctor.
Secondly, this type of seemingly excessive memorization is a type of hazing. Those who are willing to go through it have had to reaffirm their interest over and over. If you manage to survive, you have shown yourself to be dedicated, patient, and deeply motivated. Aren't those qualities you want in a clinician?
Posted by: Emily | Dec 13, 2007 2:30:27 PM
I study medicine in Turkey. Education is six years here. We learned anatomy, histology, biochemistry, physiology during our second year. Although I got good marks from the exams, I didn't enjoy that year a bit. I was considering deep inside if I chose the right job or not. Pathophsyiology and diseases were presented in the third year and it was really exciting. It was like I was born to be a doctor,but I never forgot they were human diseases.
I am an intern now, and when I have a patient with an incurable disease or cancer, I really get desparate, sometimes even angry. All that data taught us sometimes may not help. That's what I couldn't accept with medicine. Human mind can always find a solution. It's waiting for us somewhere to be found....
Posted by: melikem | Dec 13, 2007 8:51:06 PM